According to The Chicago Manual of Style (which many people regard as the editors' Bible),
1 Singular Nouns |
noun
|
possessive
|
common noun [singular] |
dog
|
dog's The dog's bowl is empty |
proper noun [singular] |
Gerry
|
Gerry's Gerry's bowl has teeth marks on it. |
2 Plural Nouns |
noun
|
possessive
|
common noun [plural] |
dogs
|
dogs' The dogs' bowl(s) are empty |
proper noun [plural] |
Toms
|
Toms' The two Toms' trials began when their Suburban got a flat. |
3 Singular Nouns (w/ "s" ending) |
noun
|
possessive
|
common noun ending in "s" [singular] |
bus
|
bus's The bus's route went by Newt's house. |
proper noun ending in "s" [singular] |
Lewis
|
Lewis's John Lewis's vibraphone is missing. [ Note exception 1] |
4 Plural Nouns (w/ "s" ending) |
noun
|
possessive
|
common noun ending in "s" [plural] |
buses
|
buses' The buses' fumes spread across the intersection. |
proper noun ending in "s" [plural] |
Lewises
|
Lewises' The Lewises' home was burglarized during their trip. [Note exception 2] |
Exception 1: According to The Chicago Manual of Style, when a proper noun ends in "s" and is 3 or more syllables [Ex. Sophocles], then the possessive is made by simply adding the apostrophe after the "s." For the previous example, that would be Sophocles' play.
Also, if a proper noun has more than one "s" in it [Ex. Jesus, Moses], then the possessive is made by simply adding the apostrophe after the "s." For the previous example, that would be Moses' disappointment.
Exception 2: Again, according to The Chicago Manual of Style, when a word is of foreign origin and ends in a silent "s" [Ex. Beaujolais, Illinois], then there is no difference in how the singular [Beaujolais'] and the plural [Beaujolais'] is written.