Paper on Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now by Jaron Lanier
Paper on Were You Born On the Wrong Continent? by Thomas Geoghegan
Grades On Canvas
[08- 36359] Monday, Wednesday, 3:00-4:15 [Alpine 231]
[09- 30219] Monday, Wednesday, 4:30-5:45 [Calaveras Hall 134]
English 20 College Composition II [3 Credit Hours]
Tim Kahl (916) 714-5401 (Please no calls after 9:30 PM) alias Victor Schnickelfritz Office: Solano 5004 [916-714-5401] Office hours: 2:00 to 3:00 Monday, Wednesday |
[08- 36359] Monday, Wednesday, 3:00-4:15 [Alpine 231] [09- 30219] Monday, Wednesday, 4:30-5:45 [Calaveras Hall 134] |
e-mail: timothy.kahl@csus.edu | Room: online [https://cccconfer.zoom.us/j/7952209062] |
Required Texts:
Required: Internet Access. one e-mail address (either with your home ISP or at a commercial site like Yahoo, Hotmail or Excite)
Program Learning Outcomes
Upon completion of a Comp II course, students will be able to
1. Describe how disciplinary values influence how a writer approaches topics, identifies audiences, develops a persona, and articulates a purpose for writing. 2. Develop an understanding of the ways texts are written, researched, organized, and disseminated in multiple disciplines. 3. Synthesize and analyze credible and relevant evidence and/or sources to support ideas for specific rhetorical purposes appropriate to a variety of disciplines. 4. Demonstrate the use of conventions relative to a variety of disciplines to develop organization, content, presentation, and style. 5. Construct texts in a variety of discipline-specific genres and media that communicate a controlling idea with clarity and fluency. 6. Demonstrate consistent control of written language in response to disciplinary expectations.
Attendance Policy: There are 32 days we are scheduled to meet. Please be present for all of them. Any absence will greatly affect your ability to meet the requirements of the course. Absences and/or early departures in excess of 5 class periods may result in my dropping you from the course. Attendance will be noted and taken into consideration concerning borderline grades when the final grade is given. Remember: You're paying for the time whether you come or not.
Electronic Submissions: You may choose to submit all question sets via electronic submissions. You may submit:
All Final drafts of papers MUST BE submitted as hard copies.
Workshop Days: All students must have rough drafts available on the designated due dates or sacrifice 10% of the total grade for that paper.
Revision Policy: One of the four out-of class papers may be turned in for revision. This paper must be below a 90 % to be eligible for revision.
Due Dates: All assignments are due on the dates given (unless otherwise notified).
Late assignments: Late assignments will be assessed a 10% penalty per late class session.
{Electronic submissions will be considered late if they are received after the end of the class period. Some leeway may be given for first-time offenders and for technical problems, but the discretion will be mine. [Note: most students choose to e-mail assignments the night before they are due.]}
New Late assignments policy: You will have one week after the due date to turn in late work. After this point, the late work will not be accepted. Exceptions to this rule will be granted only if your have received prior OK from me due to some extenuating circumstances which would not let you complete the work.
Plagiarism: Plagiarism is pretending that someone else's ideas or writing is your own. Intentional failure to cite source material will be dealt with quickly and severely. The usual result for plagiarizing will be a grade of 0 on the assignment with no make up possible. If this should occur on one of the major papers in class, this is virtually equivalent to a failing grade in the class.
Phones should not be out in class unless you are referencing something mentioned in class
Services for Students with Disabilities (916) 278-9655 sswd@csus.edu
Student Health and Counseling Services (916) 278-6461 cares@csus.edu
Crisis Assistance and Resource Education Support (CARES) (916) 278-5138
Grading Scale:
87%-89% B+ | 77%-79% C+ | 67%-69% D+ | Below 60% F | |
92%-100% A | 83%-86% B | 74%-76% C | 63%-66% D | |
90%-91% A- | 80%-83% B- | 70%-73% C- | 60%-62% D- |
Criterion For Grades On Written Assignments:
A work requires a compliance with the guidelines and the stated purpose of the assignment. Content is clear and balanced. There are no tangled sentences. A varied length of sentences is present and correct sentence structure is used. The pattern of development is clear and apparent and demonstrates forethought regarding the desired effect upon the reader. The styleand tone are appropriate to the topic and audience. There may be an occasional mistake in mechanics. The topic of the paper should aim to be fresh and original and should attempt to stretch the academic horizons of the writer. |
B work requires a compliance with the guidelines and the stated purpose of the assignment. Content is generally clear and balanced, but there may be some instances in which there are some confusing or awkward sentences, though these do not detract from the overall effect of the paper. A somewhat limited variety of sentences may exist, but the sentence structure is generally correct. The pattern of development is apparent, but may deviate at times. The style and tone of the paper are generally appropriate to the topic and audience. There are relatively few mistakes in mechanics. The topic may not demonstrate any original thinking or particularly or novel approach to the assignment. |
C work requires a fair amount of compliance with the guidelines and the stated purpose of the assignment, but may miss the stated objectives to some degree. Content is generally clear and balanced, but there may be several points where the sentence structure becomes jumbled and confused and this interferes with the flow of the paper. A limited variety of sentences is readily apparent. The pattern of development may be vague and unclear, but there is more than a semblance of formal constraint apparent. The style and tone may be somewhat varied and inappropriate for both the topic (misnomers) and the perceived audience. The topic does not demonstrate any novel approach to the given assignment. There are a distracting number of mistakes in mechanics. |
D work demonstrates a minimal amount of compliance with the guidelines and the stated purpose of the assignment. Content is unclear and unbalanced and there may be a significant amount of jumbled and confused sentences. The pattern of development is unapparent and it demonstrates a lack of forethought on the part of the writer. The style and tone of the paper are wildly varied and inappropriate for both the topic and the perceived audience. The topic does not demonstrate any novel approach to the given assignment. There are an overwhelming number of mistakes in mechanics. In general, the paper demonstrates a hurried and haphazard approach devoid of any forethought (i.e. the paper that is written the night before). |
F work demonstrates a minimal amount of compliance with the guidelines and the stated purpose of the assignment. Any work deemed to be completely unsatisfactory with regard to content, pattern of development, style, tone, topic, or mechanics. A paper in this category demonstrates an absolute minimum of effort. |
Scoring
Panama Papers [1000 words] | 100 Points |
10 Arguments For Deleting Social Media Accounts [1000 words] | 100 Points |
Wrong Continent Paper [1000 words] | 100 points |
Metacognition Review #1, #2, #3 | 40 Points each [120 points] |
Limited revision of previous paper | 40 Points |
Homework Assignments/quizzes | 140 points |
Final | 50 Points |
Total | 650 points |
Schedule of Events
Note: This schedule reflects work that will be discussed in class on the date given. Students should be prepared to discuss the items listed for that day.
Week 1
Monday, January 22 | Holiday—Martin Luther King Day |
Wednesday. January 24 | Introductions and Syllabus Discussion of paper on the Toulmin Method; Discussion of logical fallacies Introduction to the Socratic Method Discussion of Program Goals and Metacognition |
Week 2
Monday, January 27 | Read Panama Papers (pg. 1-87) [Chapters 1-6] Study questions #1 |
Wednesday, January 29 | Read Panama Papers (pg. 1-87) [Chapters 1-6] Study questions #1 due |
Week 3
Monday, February 3 | Read Panama Papers (pg. 1-87) [Chapters 7-15] Study questions #2 due |
Wednesday,. February 5 | Read Panama Papers (pg. 176-243) [Chapters 16-22] Study questions #3 |
Week 4
Monday, February 10 | Read Panama Papers (pg. 176-243) [Chapters 16-22] Study questions #3 due |
Wednesday, February 12 | Read Panama Papers (pg. 162-213) [Chapters 23-30] Study questions #4 due MLA Parenthetical Citation Day |
Week 5
Monday, February 17 | Rough Drafts for Panama Papers paper due. Discussion of student papers on web site. Whole Class critique of Panama Papers paper. Continued discussion of student papers. |
Wednesday, February 19 | Rough Drafts for Panama Papers paper due. Discussion of student papers on web site. Whole Class critique of Panama Papers paper. Continued discussion of student papers. |
Week 6
Monday, February 24 | Read Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Now part 1 (pg. 1-41) Final Draft of Panama Papers Paper due |
Wednesday, February 26 | Read Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Now part 1 (pg. 1-41) Questions #1 due. |
Week 7
Monday, March 3 | Read Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Nowpart 2 (pg. 42-76) |
Wednesday, March 5 | Read Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Nowpart 2 (pg. 42-76) Summary/Questions #2 due |
Week 8
Monday, March 10 | Read Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Nowpart 3 (pg. 112-161) continued Summary/Questions #3 due |
Wednesday March 12 | Read Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Nowpart 3 (pg. 112-161) continued Summary/Questions #3 due |
Week 9
Monday, March 17 | Read Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Nowpart 4 (pg. 112-161) continued Summary/Questions #4 due. |
Wednesday, March 19 | Read Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Nowpart 4 (pg. 112-161) continued Summary/Questions #4 due. |
Week 10
Monday, March 24 | Rough draft for Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Now Paper due. Discussion of posted student papers. Whole Class Critique (Peer Review and Discussion) |
Wednesday March 26 | Rough draft for Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Now Paper due. Discussion of posted student papers. Whole Class Critique (Peer Review and Discussion) |
Week 11
Monday, March 31 | SPRING RECESS |
Wednesday April 2 | SPRING RECESS |
Week 12
Monday, April 7 | Read Were You Born on the Wrong Continent? Part I Which Side of Paradise (pg. 3-153) |
Wednesday, April 9 | Read Were You Born on the Wrong Continent? Part I Which Side of Paradise (pg. 3-153) Study Questions #1 due Final Draft of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Now Paper due |
Week 13
Monday, April 14 | Part II Berlin Diary (pg. 153-269) |
Wednesday April 16 | Read Were You Born on the Wrong Continent? Part II Berlin Diary (pg. 153-269) Study Questions #2 due |
Week 14
Monday, April 21 | Rough draft for Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now? Paper due. Discussion of posted student papers. Whole Class Critique (Peer Review and Discussion) |
Wednesday, April 23 | Rough draft for Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now? Paper due. |
Week 15
Monday, April 28 | Final Draft of Were You Born on the Wrong Continent? Paper due Metacognition Review #1 Discussion |
Wednesday, April 30 | Metacognition Review #2 Discussion Metacognition Review #1 due |
Week 16
Monday, May 5 | Metacognition Review #3 Metacognition Review #2 due |
Wednesday, May 7 | Metacognition Review #3 due (at a specified time later) Review for final. In-class writing prompt posted. Discussion of timed in-class writing prompts. |
Week 17
Monday. May 12 | Finals week begins |
|