eng 20 logo


English 20 Video Feed Page

Paper on Toulmin Method

Logical Fallacies

The Panama Papers

Paper on Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now by Jaron Lanier

Paper on Were You Born On the Wrong Continent? by Thomas Geoghegan

Metacognition Review

Final


Extra Credit


Grades (31226)

Homework Grade 3:00 - 4:15 (31226)

Total Grade 3:00 - 4:15 (31226)


English 20 College Composition II

Tim Kahl (916) 714-5401 (Please no calls after 9:30 PM) alias Victor Schnickelfritz

Office: Solano 5004 [916-714-5401]

Monday, Wednesday 1:30-2:45 [Calaveras 134]
e-mail: tnklbnny@comcast.net Room: online [https://cccconfer.zoom.us/j/7952209062]

Required Texts:

Required: Internet Access. one e-mail address (either with your home ISP or at a commercial site like Yahoo, Hotmail or Excite)

Attendance Policy: There are 32 days we are scheduled to meet. Please be present for all of them. Any absence will greatly affect your ability to meet the requirements of the course. Absences and/or early departures in excess of 5 class periods may result in my dropping you from the course. Attendance will be noted and taken into consideration concerning borderline grades when the final grade is given. Remember: You're paying for the time whether you come or not.

Schedule and Procedure for Adds/Drops:

weeks 1-2 student can add and drop using the online system, no permissions are given

waitlists go away on day one of classes (administrative drops must be approved by the department and require a student number)

weeks 3-4, students can drop using OnBase (requires faculty and department approval)

weeks 5-12, students cannot add, drops result in a withdrawal [W]

drops are processed through OnBase [Reasons for drops include medical issues, carrying an excessive course load, student's inadequate preparation for the course or the student is having significant job or career changes.

Electronic Submissions: You may choose to submit all question sets via electronic submissions. You may submit:

All Final drafts of papers MUST BE submitted as hard copies.

color code

Workshop Days: All students must have rough drafts available on the designated due dates or sacrifice 10% of the total grade for that paper.

Revision Policy: One of the four out-of class papers may be turned in for revision. This paper must be below a 90 % to be eligible for revision.

Due Dates: All assignments are due on the dates given (unless otherwise notified).

Late assignments: Late assignments will be assessed a 10% penalty per late class session.

{Electronic submissions will be considered late if they are received after the end of the class period. Some leeway may be given for first-time offenders and for technical problems, but the discretion will be mine. [Note: most students choose to e-mail assignments the night before they are due.]}

New Late assignments policy: You will have one week after the due date to turn in late work. After this point, the late work will not be accepted. Exceptions to this rule will be granted only if your have received prior OK from me due to some extenuating circumstances which would not let you complete the work.

Plagiarism: Plagiarism is pretending that someone else's ideas or writing is your own. Intentional failure to cite source material will be dealt with quickly and severely. The usual result for plagiarizing will be a grade of 0 on the assignment with no make up possible. If this should occur on one of the major papers in class, this is virtually equivalent to a failing grade in the class. Use of ChatGPT (or other AI compiler platforms) is discouraged and prohibited from use to construct a paper in its entirety.

Grading Scale:

A B C D F
  87%-89% B+ 77%-79% C+ 67%-69% D+ Below 60% F
92%-100% A 83%-86% B 74%-76% C 63%-66% D  
90%-91% A- 80%-83% B- 70%-73% C- 60%-62% D-  

Criterion For Grades On Written Assignments:

A work requires a compliance with the guidelines and the stated purpose of the assignment. Content is clear and balanced. There are no tangled sentences. A varied length of sentences is present and correct sentence structure is used. The pattern of development is clear and apparent and demonstrates forethought regarding the desired effect upon the reader. The styleand tone are appropriate to the topic and audience. There may be an occasional mistake in mechanics. The topic of the paper should aim to be fresh and original and should attempt to stretch the academic horizons of the writer.
B work requires a compliance with the guidelines and the stated purpose of the assignment. Content is generally clear and balanced, but there may be some instances in which there are some confusing or awkward sentences, though these do not detract from the overall effect of the paper. A somewhat limited variety of sentences may exist, but the sentence structure is generally correct. The pattern of development is apparent, but may deviate at times. The style and tone of the paper are generally appropriate to the topic and audience. There are relatively few mistakes in mechanics. The topic may not demonstrate any original thinking or particularly or novel approach to the assignment.
C work requires a fair amount of compliance with the guidelines and the stated purpose of the assignment, but may miss the stated objectives to some degree. Content is generally clear and balanced, but there may be several points where the sentence structure becomes jumbled and confused and this interferes with the flow of the paper. A limited variety of sentences is readily apparent. The pattern of development may be vague and unclear, but there is more than a semblance of formal constraint apparent. The style and tone may be somewhat varied and inappropriate for both the topic (misnomers) and the perceived audience. The topic does not demonstrate any novel approach to the given assignment. There are a distracting number of mistakes in mechanics.
D work demonstrates a minimal amount of compliance with the guidelines and the stated purpose of the assignment. Content is unclear and unbalanced and there may be a significant amount of jumbled and confused sentences. The pattern of development is unapparent and it demonstrates a lack of forethought on the part of the writer. The style and tone of the paper are wildly varied and inappropriate for both the topic and the perceived audience. The topic does not demonstrate any novel approach to the given assignment. There are an overwhelming number of mistakes in mechanics. In general, the paper demonstrates a hurried and haphazard approach devoid of any forethought (i.e. the paper that is written the night before).
F work demonstrates a minimal amount of compliance with the guidelines and the stated purpose of the assignment. Any work deemed to be completely unsatisfactory with regard to content, pattern of development, style, tone, topic, or mechanics. A paper in this category demonstrates an absolute minimum of effort.

Scoring

Panama Papers [1000 words] 100 Points
10 Arguments For Deleting Social Media Accounts [1000 words] 100 Points
Wrong Continent Paper [1000 words] 100 points
Metacognition Review #1, #2, #3 40 Points each [120 points]
Limited revision of previous paper 40 Points
Homework Assignments/quizzes 140 points
Final 50 Points

 

Total 650 points

 

Schedule of Events

Note: This schedule reflects work that will be discussed in class on the date given. Students should be prepared to discuss the items listed for that day.

Week 1

Monday. January 22 Introductions and Syllabus
Wednesday. January 24

Discussion of paper on the Toulmin Method; Discussion of logical fallacies

Introduction to the Socratic Method

Discussion of Program Goals and Metacognition

 

Week 2

Monday. January 29

Read Panama Papers (pg. 1-87) [Chapters 1-6] Study questions #1

Wednesday. January 31 Read Panama Papers (pg. 1-87) [Chapters 1-6] Study questions #1 due

 

Week 3

Monday February 5

Read Panama Papers (pg. 1-87) [Chapters 7-15] Study questions #2

Wednesday. February 7 Read Panama Papers (pg. 1-87) [Chapters 7-15] Study questions #2 due

 

Week 4

Monday. February 12

Read Panama Papers (pg. 176-243) [Chapters 16-22] Study questions #3 due

Wednesday. February 14

Read Panama Papers (pg. 162-213) [Chapters 23-30] Study questions #4 due

MLA Parenthetical Citation Day

 

Week 5

Monday. February 19

Rough Drafts for Panama Papers paper due. Discussion of student papers on web site.

Whole Class critique of Panama Papers paper. Continued discussion of student papers.

Wednesday. February 21

Rough Drafts for Panama Papers paper due. Discussion of student papers on web site.

Whole Class critique of Panama Papers paper. Continued discussion of student papers.

 

Week 6

Monday. February 26

Read Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Now part 1 (pg. 1-41)

Summary/Questions #1 due.

Final Draft of Panama Papers Paper due

Wednesday. February 28

Read Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Now part 1 (pg. 1-41)

Summary/Questions #1 due.

 

Week 7

Monday. March 4

Read Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Nowpart 2 (pg. 42-76) continued

Summary/Questions #2 due

Wednesday. March 6

Read Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Nowpart 2 (pg. 42-76) continued

Summary/Questions #2 due

 

Week 8

Monday. March 11

Read Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Nowpart 3 (pg. 112-161) continued

Summary/Questions #3 due

Wednesday. March 13

Read Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Nowpart 3 (pg. 112-161) continued

Summary/Questions #3 due

 

Week 9

Monday. March 18

Spring Recess

Wednesday. March 20

Spring Recess

 

Week 10

Monday. March 25

Read Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Nowpart 4 (pg. 112-161) continued

Summary/Questions #4 due.

Wednesday. March 27

Read Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Nowpart 4 (pg. 112-161) continued

Summary/Questions #4 due.

 

Week 11

Monday. April 1

Rough draft for Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Now Paper due. Discussion of posted student papers.

Whole Class Critique (Peer Review and Discussion)

Wednesday. April 3

Rough draft forTen Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Now Paper due. Discussion of posted student papers.

Whole Class Critique (Peer Review and Discussion)

 

Week 12

Monday. April 8

Read Were You Born on the Wrong Continent?

Wednesday. April 10

Read Were You Born on the Wrong Continent?

Part I Which Side of Paradise (pg. 3-153)

Study Questions #1 due

 

Week 13

Monday. April 15

Part II Berlin Diary (pg. 153-269)

Final Draft of Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Now Paper due

Wednesday. April 17

Read Were You Born on the Wrong Continent?

Part II Berlin Diary (pg. 153-269)

Study Questions #2 due

 

Week 14

Monday. April 22

Rough draft for Were You Born on the Wrong Continent? Paper due.

Discussion of posted student papers.

Whole Class Critique (Peer Review and Discussion)

Wednesday. April 24

Rough draft for Were You Born on the Wrong Continent? Paper due.

Discussion of posted student papers.

Whole Class Critique (Peer Review and Discussion)

 

Week 15

Monday. April 29

Final Draft of Were You Born on the Wrong Continent? Paper due

Metacognition Review #1 Discussion

Wednesday. May 1

Metacognition Review #2 Discussion

Metacognition Review #1 due

 

Week 16

Monday. May 6

Metacognition Review #3

Metacognition Review #2 due

Wednesday. May 8

Metacognition Review #3 due

Review for final. In-class writing prompt posted.

Discussion of timed in-class writing prompts.

 

Week 17

Finals week begins May 13